Hi, I don't know if this is meant to be constructive or a call-out / "gotcha," but I'm going to respond in good faith.

Anatomical terms are not inherently uninclusive. "Vulva" refers to a specific configuration of external genitalia, regardless of who it belongs to. Anatomic language only becomes "uninclusive" when people gender those parts and say things like "only women have vulvas/vaginas," which isn't true. It can, in fact, be really dangerous not to refer to things correctly, because then trans men and intersex people with vulvas may not be able to receive suitable healthcare, such as pap smears if they have a cervix. A trans woman's postoperative vulva is a vulva (and indistinguishable from a cis woman's), which is what GCs like Pin try to deny. Some men have vulvas and some women have penises; body parts don't have genders, people do.